PETA slavery case against SeaWorld dismissed, as whales are not people
Back to Topic
Click to Print
Useful Websites
Glossary Term Selection
After People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) launched a lawsuit against SeaWorld, accusing them of violating the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery, judge Jeffrey Miller threw it out. The judge ruled that orcas do not have the same constitutional rights as people.
The lawsuit was filed in the US district court of San Diego, with five of SeaWorld’s performing orcas listed as plaintiffs: Katina, Tilikum, Corky, Kasatka and Ulises.
In his ruling, judge Jeffrey Miller wrote: ‘The only reasonable interpretation of the 13th amendment’s plain language is that it applies to persons and not to non-persons such as orcas.’
David Steinberg, a law professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, said the lawsuit is ‘demeaning to the integrity and humanity of people who were owned as slaves’.
That’s actually a pretty good point, and while I think it’s ridiculous that animals are still held in captivity for o
Want to see the rest of this article?
Would you like to see the rest of this article and all the other benefits that Issues Online can provide with?
- Useful related articles
- Video and multimedia references
- Statistical information and reference material
- Glossary of terms
- Key Facts and figures
- Related assignments
- Resource material and websites
